From: "Ronny Julian" <k4rjj@...>
Sep 24, 2004
I thought everyone had given up on this. I see it's not the case.
Has anyone been able to change the server settings from Earthlink? I've
still got 2 brand new units here. I was going to take one and toy around
with the idea of spoofing their IP inside my own DNS and creating my own
dialup port. With WiFi being "everywhere" around Atlanta it's not really
worth the trouble anymore though.
I had tried back when these were "free" to get a womens shelter to get them.
They said they were only accepting PII or better machines for donation and
they "preferred laptops". Well La De Dah! I never thought I'd see the day
you could not give away a free machine!
Good luck, good hacking!
Ronny
From: "Neil Morrison" <neilsmorr@...>
Sep 24, 2004
Which models? The Yahoo ones seem to be best.
Neil
From: "Ronny Julian" <k4rjj@...>
From: "John R. Hogerhuis" <jhoger@...>
Sep 24, 2004
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 14:42, Ronny Julian wrote:
I am interested in running alternative firmware on the thing... say with
ZCN or maybe a hacked up TRS-80 Model 100 ROM, or a make it a
stand-alone Forth machine...
In fact interfacing to the outside world is a challenge on the
mailstation. It's highest speed interface is its parallel port.
Once we have alternative firmware, I think a MailStation will be every
bit as useful as the various smart keyboards that are around. Only thing
that would make it much better is if it had a USB port.
CJ has already done the heavy lifting by reverse engineering the code
enough to produce a tool which can program the flash over the parallel
port.
Unforunately I don't know much about using the existing firmware. There
are various notes over at linux-hacker which you've probably already
found.
From: Robert Pittman <pittmanr99@...>
Sep 26, 2004
I've looked at the possibility of breaking the key code, but this could be dangerous in light of the DMCA.
//--unintelligible--//
//--unintelligible--//
//--unintelligible--//
//--unintelligible--//
"Anthony Z." <hunter_az@...> wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone know that the �Function +
D + Reset� is only for Restoring the default account.
The default account is the
@.... this is handy if you
are giving a mailstation away and don�t want to leave
any information (e-mails, settings, or address book
information) in the unit.
I know the "Function + Shift + T + Power On" should
work for putting your own settings in. When you use
"Function + Shift + T + Power On" that should leave
you at the �Diagnostic Menu�. First you need to do the
�Fast Test�, this should be option number 2. This will
test �Flash, Key, Printer Port, RAM and ROM�, after
that screen it will go to the �Battery TESTING�
screen. You then need to hit the �Enter� key twice,
this will drop you back to the �Diagnostic� Menu, now
hit �Q� for quit. You should see the �Test Over!�
message, then it will dump you out at the standard
reset menu, just hit �No Clear� and if all went well
you should see a prompt like �Please create a new user
account�. Just hit OK and slap you info in to the
unit.
Also I was able to find some interesting information
on the XTND commands. The XTND commands are used in
configuration of the mailstation. When a configuration
is generated the key code is also created verifying
that it�s a real configuration. The unit will then
take all the configuration information and configure
its-self.
From what i have gathered there are 2 parts to the
mailstation service. First you have your standard POP3
Mailbox and they have a Mail Proxy that sits over it.
The Mail Proxy chops up long e-mails and strips out
some advertisements that would normally cause the mail
not to come though. I don�t know what method the proxy
uses to figure what parts to strip but if anyone has
idea please let me know.
|-------| |-----| |-------|
|POP3 |<->|PROXY|<--|MAIL |
|Mailbox| | | |STATION|
|-------| |-----| |-------|
Anyways this leaves me with several questions about
the key code. I�m thinking that the Mail Proxy
verifies the key and sends all the configuration
information to the mailstation. I have tried to
simulate configuration messages but to no avail.
Anyone else working in this direction?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
(URL)
Yahoo! Groups Links
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
//--unintelligible--//
//--unintelligible--//
//--unintelligible--//
From: "Anthony Z." <hunter_az@...>
Sep 26, 2004
aahhh I see. Well, I can understand wanting to stay
out of legal/DMCA issues. Well I guess we will have to
look at something else. I for one dont want to get in
trouble over a mailstation. Well I'm going to do some
more thinking, and see what I can figure out. I'll
keep you posted.
It seems the parallel flash is going to be the best
bet to do anything with the mailstation :)
Oh well, just a though....
I've looked at the possibility of breaking the key
code, but this could be dangerous in light of the
DMCA.
The method of sending updates to a Mailstation is
covered by US Patent 6,697,942. The "security key" is
discussed in this patent, and the patent mentions
"Simple DES" cyphers. I'm no expert in cryptography,
so I wouldn't know how to go about generating a valid
key, and even if I did, there's no guarantee that the
method described in the patent is the method used.
Any attempt to circumvent the security process could
result in legal issues. This is why I haven't looked
into this area very closely. I've created and sent
messages to my Mailstation without a security key and
have had no luck in updating anything. It seems that
the security key verifies that the message is legit,
and without it you're going to have no luck in
changing any settings.
Another member is exploring the possibility of
changing the contents of the on-board flash through
the parallel port built in to the machine. I think
there's more possibility of success using that
approach, but it requires extra equipment that I don't
have right now.
The processor is a Z80-derivative, so information is
readily available on the Web. The problem is that
there could be several megabytes of code to wade
through to find the code that verifies the key, and it
may not be easy to recognize when you see it. I'm not
saying it's impossible; it's just not your typical
weekend project. I'm sure it's only a matter of time
before someone isolates that code and finds a way
around it.
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
(URL)
From: "Neil Morrison" <neilsmorr@...>
Sep 26, 2004
charset="iso-8859-1"
If it's done outside of the USA - no problems. Why is it that "the land of=
the free" is so very unfree?
Regards,
Neil Morrison
ssage -----
From: Robert Pittman
I've looked at the possibility of =
breaking the key code, but this could be dangerous in light of the DMCA.
=
The method of sending updates to a Mailstation is covered by US Patent 6,6=
97,942. The "security key" is discussed in this patent, and the patent men=
tions "Simple DES" cyphers. I'm no expert in cryptography, so I wouldn't k=
now how to go about generating a valid key, and even if I did, there's no g=
uarantee that the method described in the patent is the method used.
Any=
attempt to circumvent the security process could result in legal issues. T=
his is why I haven't looked into this area very closely. I've created and s=
ent messages to my Mailstation without a security key and have had no luck =
in updating anything. It seems that the security key verifies that the mess=
age is legit, and without it you're going to have no luck in changing any s=
ettings.
...
charset="iso-8859-1"
">
IV>
roblems. Why
is it that "the land of the free" is so very unfree?</FONT></=
DIV><FONT
face=3DArial>
FONT></FONT></DIV>
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: =
5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
=
V
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>=
From:</B>
o.com">Robert
Pittman</A> </DIV>
NT><BR></DIV>
e, but this could
be dangerous in light of the DMCA.</DIV>
face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
tes to a Mailstation is covered by US Patent
6,697,942. The "secur=
ity key" is discussed in this patent, and the
patent mentions =
"Simple DES" cyphers. I'm no expert in
cryptography, so I wou=
ldn't know how to go about generating a valid key, and
even if I did, th=
ere's no guarantee that the method described in the patent is
the method=
used.</DIV>
Any attempt to circumvent the security process could result in legal
iss=
ues. This is why I haven't looked into this area very closely. I've created=
and sent messages to my Mailstation without a security key and have had=
no
luck in updating anything. It seems that the security key verif=
ies that
the message is legit, and without it you're going to have no lu=
ck in changing
any settings.</DIV>
FONT> </DIV>
|**| --></BODY></HTML>